Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 06:42
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What are 5 ways that can be done by the community to improve the public transport system?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What is your craziest college sex story?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
ESA signs agreement for potential use of Orbital Reef - SpaceNews
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Forget Ray-Bans: The $399 Meta Oakley smart glasses are better in almost every way - ZDNET
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Why do I sweat so much after applying moisture or sun screen on my face? I have normal skin.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
World Boxing apologizes for naming Olympic champion Imane Khelif in sex test policy - NBC News